Mati Systemshello@matisystems.com

Engineering Teams: is what you built production ready?

AI coding agents are part of your team's workflow now. Your review process wasn't built for what they get wrong.

Teams that already have engineers, code review, and CI are usually ahead of the curve on basic hygiene. But AI coding agents introduce failure patterns that a standard PR review, calibrated for human-written code, doesn't reliably catch: duplicated logic across files that were never opened side by side, auth checks copied instead of centralized, conventions that drift over a long agentic session.

Already know you want this? Email hello@matisystems.com. No pitch, just a scoping call. Or keep reading for what matters most in your situation.

What matters here

Volume changes the review problem

AI agents can produce more reviewable code per day than your team can carefully read. The bottleneck moves from writing to reviewing, and most review processes weren't built for that ratio.

The failure patterns are different

Human developers who copy-paste know they're doing it. An AI agent doing the same thing produces code that looks intentional either way. The tell is in the pattern, not the diff.

Guardrails, not just review

The highest-leverage fix isn't reviewing more, it's preventing an agent from touching what it shouldn't in the first place, which is what Mati, the open-source guardrail tool, is for.

What you get

  • A PRISM audit of the parts of your codebase most touched by AI agents
  • Specific guidance on where your review process is likely missing AI-specific failure patterns
  • Guardrail recommendations, including Mati, scoped to your actual tooling

Frequently asked

We already do code review. Why would we need this?

Standard code review is calibrated for how humans make mistakes. AI agents fail differently: duplicated logic across files a human reviewer wouldn't think to compare, auth checks copied instead of centralized. This audit is scoped to those specific patterns.

Can you review just the AI-generated portions of our codebase?

Yes, if you can point to what was AI-assisted versus hand-written, the audit can focus there specifically, though in practice the two are often tangled enough that a full review is more useful.

Do you offer ongoing support, not just a one-time audit?

Yes, as Engineering Advisory: ongoing PR review, architecture calls, and guardrail design for teams that want this as a continuous process rather than a single engagement.

What's Mati, and should we be using it?

Mati is an open-source tool that stops AI coding agents from editing critical files until they've read the rules that protect them. Whether it fits your setup depends on your tooling. Happy to talk through it on the scoping call.

If that sounds like where you are, an AI Codebase Audit is the place to start.

Email hello@matisystems.com for a free 20-minute call. No pitch, no obligation. Mati Systems usually replies the same day.